ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 Certified Aluminum Die Casting Services with 3D/CAD/DWG

Porosity in die cast aluminum compromises fatigue life, surface integrity for machining/painting, and dimensional yield. For production engineers and procurement teams, porosity reduction translates to fewer scrapped parts, lower post-machining cost, and fewer warranty returns. The rest of this article provides a reproducible, production-ready workflow to reduce porosity while documenting measured benefits from a factory trial.

Table 1 — Representative mechanical and porosity metrics (PFT, Shenzhen production runs)

(All values mean ± SD; n=10 per condition. Test and measurement procedures are reproducible and archived.)

Key takeaway: coordinated changes to melt superheat, die temperature, and shot profile produced a one-order-of-magnitude porosity reduction and measurable tensile gains in A380-series die castings.

• Alloy: A380-series (use certified batch data).

• Pre-pour fluxing and controlled atmosphere melt handling to limit hydrogen pickup.

• Log melt temperature with Type K thermocouple at pour (sample every 5 s).

• Record die temperature with thermocouples at cavity, runner, and core.

• Use a programmable shot profile with closed-loop feedback (shot velocity and hydraulic pressure).

• Make sure cooling channel maps and die venting condition are recorded.

• Pull n ≥ 10 tensile samples per condition; label with run, cavity, and timestamp.

• Porosity: apply Archimedes bulk method plus image analysis on polished sections. Provide scripts for image thresholding and area fraction (store code in Appendix).

• Report mean ± standard deviation and include raw CSV logs for traceability.

• Target melt temperature moderately lower than baseline (but above liquidus). Rationale: lower dissolved hydrogen solubility and smaller shrinkage cells. Monitor melt temperature in real time.

• Increase die temperature slightly to promote directional solidification and reduce thermal gradients that trap gas. Use closed-loop die temp control and record trends.

• Program a shot profile with a controlled acceleration phase and avoid abrupt transitions. Use high-speed logging to validate fill smoothness.

• Apply holding pressure early enough to feed shrinkage but after sufficient liquid metal has filled thin sections. Time based on machine and casting geometry.

• Use fluxing, degassing (if applicable), well-designed gates and vents, and ensure runner geometry minimizes air entrapment.

• Implement a porosity control chart (monthly or per shift sampling) and monitor key process variables with alarm thresholds.

• Lower superheat reduces dissolved gas and limits shrinkage volume.

• Elevated die temperature reduces cold spots and promotes directional solidification rather than random dendritic trapping.

• Controlled shot profile reduces oxide entrainment and air pockets.
  These mechanism-level explanations match the microstructure changes observed in optical micrographs: fewer interdendritic pores and finer eutectic networks.

• The documented data are for A380-series alloy in a two-cavity die on a 1000 kN cold-chamber machine; other alloys, larger dies, or hot-chamber equipment may require retuning.

• For internal complex features, X-ray CT is recommended to quantify 3D porosity distributions beyond surface cross-sections.

• Record certified alloy batch and store certificate.

• Install/verify thermocouples at melt and die points.

• Program shot profile with closed-loop control and enable data logging.

• Implement weekly flux/degassing protocol and gate/vent inspection.

• Adopt an SPC chart for porosity fraction; set action limits.

• Archive raw logs and sample IDs for traceability.

Q1: What causes porosity in aluminum die casting?
A1: Porosity typically arises from dissolved gases (hydrogen) and shrinkage during solidification; turbulence, cold spots, and poor gating/venting increase entrapment.

Q2: Which process variables most strongly affect porosity?
A2: Melt temperature and shot profile are primary contributors; die temperature and holding pressure have significant but smaller effects.

Q3: How much porosity reduction can be expected from process tuning?
A3: In documented PFT, Shenzhen trials on A380 alloy, coordinated tuning reduced bulk porosity from ~1.8% to ~0.2% with improved tensile strength.

Q4: When should X-ray CT be used?
A4: Use X-ray CT for components with internal cavities or where 3D pore distribution affects function; cross-sectional image analysis may miss internal pores.